🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard females from violence, including domestic abuse, following extensive and heated debates in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the process of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in last year, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move proposed by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the primary political groups advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked widespread outcry both inside Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice driven by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since Turkey left the treaty in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority support, the president could possibly return the legislation for additional consideration if he holds objections.

Head of State the national leader announced on social media that he would assess the vote according to legal principles, "considering governmental and judicial factors, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," stated a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect similar debates in other EU countries